My understanding is that BWF updates it weekly and that it’s particular to Olympic qualifying, apart from the tripartite (wildcard) guidelines.
“The world rankings as of April 28, 2020 will probably be used to allocate athlete quota locations in males’s and ladies’s singles, and males’s, ladies’s and combined doubles.”
I am not so certain that the variety of factors you accumulate in the course of the qualifying interval issues. if I am at quantity 3 initially and also you’re at quantity 9, you will gather extra factors than me in the course of the qualifying interval, however on the finish of the qualifying interval I am nonetheless at quantity 3, and also you’re at quantity 4, I am going to do that also be seeded increased than you for the match.
additionally, from what i perceive studying the reg, the ‘noc’ allocation standards are used earlier than the continental allocation…?
anyway, each time I learn the reg’s it turns into much less clear: https://extranet.bwfbadminton.com/docs/document-system/81/1466/1471/Part 5.4.1.1 – OG – Qualifying Rules for Tokyo 2020 (ENG).pdf
Nothing exhibits up once I click on in your hyperlink, however I am very to see it. do you’ve a greater hyperlink?
it’s not a rule, however extra of an interpretation of contract language. bka and bwf ought to settle the matter themselves by mediation/arbitration/courtroom/no matter, in the event that they wish to go that far.
BWF would haven’t any authorized standing for this, as there is no such thing as a contract that binds search engine marketing to BWF.
once more, bwf has no authorized standing to demand something from search engine optimization.
On the smaller and fewer rich associations, fines are often break up between the participant and their affiliation… the affiliation. bwf has to pay, then the assoc. tells the participant that they won’t take part in any extra tournaments till they pay again the affiliation. No matter occurs in case of search engine marketing is taken care of between BKA and search engine marketing.
ko v. bka was a home civil regulation matter that challenged the legality of the foundations of bka imposed on korean residents. bwf was a peripheral celebration within the lawsuit, however had no authorized standing to make concessions, calls for or affect. ko’s participant standing, lively or retired, as seen by bwf, was not related to the case. if the fines had been piling up on behalf of ksh and bwf wished their cash, it might be a matter of bwf v. bka.
search engine optimization might go the identical route and sue bka to get him into tournaments, however bka might (and possibly would) prohibit chae & choi from taking part in with him. I am unable to speculate what bka would truly do as I do not know anybody inside bka. All I do know is that that is extraordinarily dangerous for all of the gamers who’re involuntarily concerned on this feud.
I grew to become a fair larger fan of ksh as a result of he stood up and challenged this side of the present archaic system.
It can take a really wealthy participant/individual with nothing however time on his arms to sue BWF and overthrow the present system.